Donate

Showing posts with label typography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label typography. Show all posts

14_11_09

Drawing, to see better

A new way of seeing concepts: drawings (paintings) of concepts linked to each other. I see a blue dark nightly sky, with a spheric gradient black-blue, many stars everywhere, probably white and yellow, small. Concepts appear in words, simply styled in clear type.
Shows relationships between concepts. The play between, a vision.

Example:
What Freedom Really Is
What Freedom Really Is, 2014
The (night) sky/background is essential to describe elements of otherness, i.e. Life and the World, what else exists.
This drawing above displays what one can think after experiencing the exilarating sensation of freedom, the excitation coming from myriads of possibilities suddenly imagined, as if they weren't there before. After that point, one realises the limits one really has to play with, the fact that one's actions are seriously limited, not by the capacity of action (the ability to perform), but by the final consequences of those actions and their rare importance, rare relevance to the actor's life.
The bullshit/random world thus oppress the small minority of relevant actions, and one gets lost in the desert of randomness, as the force to see through bullshit gets dimmed, obscured by the giant immensity it has to fight with.
The true creative moment is for one to get into an autistic mode within the Meaningful realm, the zone of repetitive creation. The capacity to navigate towards the centre of the Useful Things. Getting lost.

11_10_09

Fake Interview on Typography

Why is Typography so special ? Because letters are the visual atoms of language, and language defines us. We are language machines, and anything else, the physical world included, is only an unnessential accessory, a way-through, the organ/obstacle of our nature, which lies in language.

Why is the visual part of language more important than the audible part, phonems..etc ? I don't think it is. There is simply no art, studies, or ways to think about the audible side of letters. Phonetics and phonology touches into neurology, not yet into psychology or psychoanalysis. I just don't see how one can be excited about various "aaa" sounds, just yet.

Don't we use other senses to express ourselves? Body language isn't a well-formed language, analytically speaking. I love perfumes but they have the same problem.

Are letters that important? Isn't the content of a text so much more vital than the way the letters are drawn? I believe most people can understand the obvious principle of typography: that letter-shapes carry different mental "packages" or cultural assimilation: Stencil fonts feel strong and manly, Courier feels mechanical, Script faces feel classical..etc. But it takes a lot of imagination and sensitivity to feel how the emotions of shapes can be much more than a mental accessory.

Isn't typography just about the legibility/readbility issue? Typography is the mother of Text and its pedestal and its autel and its backlight. It is the hidden and invisible power that makes content shine.

What is the Graal, the aim, the god, the dream of typography? I see a mirage, an idea, of words on the page. I believe there can be letter-shapes that transcend their content because their shapes capture the full attention of the eye, of the brain. And the meaning of words would flow in the mind, invisibly, as in a mutual endeavour of the outside/inside. I believe and dream in the resolution of the brain/mind issue. There is a light coming out of a shape that fits its content, and we are still in the infancy of creating such shapes.

Ok... let's take a step back. Design has an influence on how we think, so isn't typography a cousin of architecture, or industrial design? Yes, but objects and walls are only doors to memories, images and sensations. Letter-shapes, and only them, are also doors to the logical mind.

So typography is the supreme Art of design? Yes.

What do you think other designers would say about that? They would not like it, but I cannot convince them. Like I said, it takes a peculiar mind to see why typography rules.

10_03_21

typography

Watched Helvetica , so now I'm exploring meanings underneath typograpy:

serif : historical, calligraphy, elegance (?) / complex, archaic
serif : historical, calligraphy, elegance (?) / complex, archaic
serif serif serif serif serif
sans-serif : simple, straight, quick, elegance (?) / brutal, simplistic
sans-serif : simple, straight, quick, elegance (?) / brutal, simplistic
sans-serif : simple, straight, quick, elegance (?) / brutal, simplistic
size matters too size matters too  size matters too size matters too
 So Anyway, should titles be Serifs or non-serifs? Should in-texts (texts in content bodies) be serifs or non-serifs?